![]() ![]() There's a scene early on in where Scout is reading in bed until Atticus glances at his watch and declares it's late, they talk about how Jem will receive the pocket-watch when Atticus is gone, and how Scout when old enough will have her late mother's jewellery.Ītticus leaves the room, and there's a beautifully poignant dialogue between Scout and Jem (off-camera) There's more background on Atticus' family and the history of Maycomb.īut the movie does include extra scenes not part of the novel, usually to condense some lengthy descriptive part of the narrative into a short piece of exposition. The book is wonderful, really charmingly written, and of course more complete. Once again, like with Lord of the Rings, an equally good movie was made out of it. ![]() I absolutely loved the Margaret Mitchell's Novel. Some say the movie is better, but I liked both. The movie is better than the book.Įxorcist, I liked the book as much as the movie. Again, Spielberg made an exceptional movie out of a Booker prize winning Novel. It's a miracle, it's been made into an equally good movie. It's not easy to make Lord of the Rings into movie. And for those us who can't get enough of it (there are millions of us), the movie's a super gift by Peter Jackson. ![]() Both the Book and Movie are in the same league. And for a part, Jhonny Fontane's part must have been cut off from the book. The book was very good too, but the Lucy Mancini spoiled the classic status for it. Cher wrote: "Out of curiosity, what films do live up to the great books you've read? " ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |